TARGET 160203

THE OVERALL EVENT




NOTE: I've planned for this part of this Target of the Week to be used more as training than as "just another practice target". As such, you might want to spend more time with this aspect than with the others even though it is not the main targeted activity. This part of the tasking will teach you something about how your mind works during a remote viewing session, and that is far more valuable to you than any "hits" or score. Never forget that "The main purpose of a practice target is NOT to learn something about the target. It is to learn something about yourself."

The overall event in this case is the opening ceremony of the 2014 Youth Olympics. Just the ceremony, not the entire olympics, sports events, etc. Within that ceremony there were several dozen totally different activities that took place.

(Here's the training part:)

One of the facts about remote viewers, especially beginning remote viewers is that any time a complex event or location is given and only one aspect of it is targeted, they are often lured away from the targeted aspect to another that is more interesting. In remote viewing, these other, more interesting aspects are called, " attractors ".

Early practitioners learned that this was a simple, but effective way to prevent something from being viewed - simply hide it among things that are more interesting.

This target of the week is designed to give you a small sampling of that and hopefully to give you practice at overcoming it. So, I have taking the tasking in steps: first the location, then the overall event, and later, the one single aspect which is the real target. This "stepped" method of tasking is what a good remote viewing Project Manager often uses to get viewers onto target when the overall location or event is very complex.

So, for a moment, ignoring the tasking to describe the single targeted "activity", judge only the "event" part of your session(s) results against what is given in this feedback.

Ideally, you will have a complete mish-mash of often conflicting perceptions. The overall event has exciting displays and performances, people sitting quietly watching people doing the active performances, Olympic officials giving long and boring speeches and dedications, people setting up and tearing down props, and a whole host of confusing and often conflicting things. If that's what you got, then you did well.

On the other hand, your mind may have just avoided all the confusion and focused on a single part of the overall event. That is normal, too. If so, then you have learned what your mind will do in those cases. That is important for you to know. If you watch the following video (2 hours long - sorry) of the whole event and find that you did focus in on a single part of it - and described that part well, then once again --- you did a good job.

In fact, your mind may have just avoided the confusion all together and focused in on the targeted event. If so, and you don't have any information about the overall event, then you have found out something else about the way your mind works in remote viewing. Good going there, too.

Anyway, the only thing this task asks for is whether or not you described the overall event. As you look through the feedback for this task, look to see whether or not you were describing the overall opening ceremony or >>any<< of the activities involved in it The main thing here is whether or not your mind "went to the event".

The opening ceremony was 2 hours long and a listing of every activity just isn't possible, so I am presenting the following 2-hour video as your feedback (with my apology for its length). It is the entire ceremony. If you're like most viewers who are given a general target, you will have viewed those different parts of the event that interest you the most. So, look through the video for what you viewed (skimming is definitely allowed). The video is long, but I can almost guarantee that at least one spot in it will cause you to say, "THAT's what I viewed!!" If that happens, you acquired site contact and you can count this part as a good session.