OtherT : great idea Lyn : Glenn will pick the next tgt? OtherT : brilliant idea, courtney dave : courtney - your voice is a bit fuzzy and quiet Lyn : better dave : mouth-microphone distance ? OtherT : the sound cut outa few moments ago, courtney, but not all the way OtherT : sounds like it, dave OtherT : sound is better now, courtney dave : I expect the time outbounder is assured to be blind to the session work submitted to Courtney? OtherT : dave it would have to be that way Provi : target is an event, describe the event? or does it have to be specific to month? target is an event in March, describe the event? Courtney : 404-289-4107 Courtney's FAX Col : Provi - target is an event, describe event. OtherT : ty Courtney Dan : Co ordinates? Lyn : I should be able to live a normal life for a month. Yeah! That'll happen. dave : courtney - please voice your fax numbers for the audio archive folk... OtherT : lol lyn Provi : thanx Col : Courtney: Do you want the entire session, or just the Summary plus sketches? Rich : What about Daz and his guys? OtherT : Courtney, are you excluding Daz and Marv and others? Col : you're in charge Lyn!! Ha!! Lyn : Yeah! That'l be the day, too. Col : names of viewers, however, shouldn't be disclosed - so.... OtherT : I'll have to bring my work over to you, Lyn. OtherT : no i mean to date OtherT : you can't determine whether or not to approve me without seeing my work to date OtherT : you misunderstood, courtney Dan : she means resume herself OtherT : no of course not Col : Courtney: Do you want the entire session, or just the Summary plus sketches? OtherT : it's different from yours Col : Do you NEEEEED sessions, or are you looking at the Summaries only? OtherT : another question for after these are answered: Do you want viewers who have completed the entire training through advanced? Provi : good ?, T OtherT : ty Provi OtherT : good point Col : are the session perceptions being scored or are the Summaries being scored for this project? Col : exactly... Lyn : You're fading out. Col : can you speak right into the Mike pls....sounds like you're turning your head.. Col : good! OtherT : another question for after these are answered: Do you want viewers who have completed the entire training through advanced? Lyn : Not necessary. Rich : Will the complete protocol and procedure be posted at farsight? Provi : why? 'close' it this way? Lyn : I have a basic theory question. Courtney : Lyn, your sound is off. OtherT : makes sense. It won't be polluted by other people's thoughts that way Provi : I'm sorry if I am confused here.. but wouldn't this 'dirty' the end results of the rv session? I might be using the wrong terms. Provi : oh... got it Lyn : How does this reflect on "alternate universes" or "alternate realities"? Col : time loop.... Provi : thanx, Lyn... I have been wondering the same thing. Provi : thank you, Courtney for explaining Lyn : No, I mean the basic querstion of how the entire experiment relates to "alternate realities"? dave : It sounds to me like the process is effectively the same as an ARV time loop without the decision linkage. So, the analogy of a stone in the pond of time applies - Lyn assigning the target is the stone... Lyn : I'm afraid that I still only see a single reality - with a single timeline. Col : how does one score/analyze a session when there's no feedback existing for it yet? OtherT : Col there will be with Lyn as the temporal outbounder Provi : oh.. so it's not about 'other dimensions' of consciousness - it's about how it's experienced in the here and now. OtherT : how events in time/space are fixed though observation I should think, Provi dave : scoring is done retrospectively after the sessions are closed. the March target will be scored in April Provi : yeah... 'fixed' through observation - anchored into one reality - not realy alternate. OtherT : Provi, right. That's why Courtney is inserting a temporal outbounder person -- lyn Lyn : OK. I see from the reference to Schroedinger's cat, but that is still only multiple possibilities, not multiple realities. Rich : Sounds like an extension of the double slit experiment Dan : so if you name your target 4 months from now...you stand a chance of several realities... but if you wait till the future to select the target at that time you focus the reality to one Provi : alternate reality to me is altered into parallel universes and/or dimensions.. it's multiplicity of possibilities from one view is what I'm perceiving as 'alternate reality'... make sense? OtherT : i think it is a brilliant idea courtney Col : viewing the feedback... Provi : theory - expectation - results ---- then it's the multiciplity of expectations that is considered the alternate realities? Lyn : It would be nice, though. Dan : i could use a couple dollars... thanks courtney OtherT : lol dan Provi : question Dan : coordinates? Dan : ok Provi : as a viewer - my concern is the target - not all the theoretical explanations that have just taken place... right? Lyn : Date of session / your viewer number / session # and 1 Dan : will we be using a cover sheet Lyn : The target is an event.... describe >>>the event<<< Provi : k Provi : recap pls Provi : project is crv event for a specific month? Courtney : courtney1@farsight.org Provi : crv of target is keeping in mind what the event will be in March? Provi : got it Dan : what is the name for this project...for my files Provi : whew! makes it easier. Provi : thank you Dan : thank you OtherT : I did a very similar experiment, Courtney ... right after first hearing about remote viewing. I did a session on somone i would randomly choose at a seminar i wa giving a month in the future OtherT : it was uncanny and changed the target person's life Col : Viewing a future event that WILL happen OtherT : sound... Lyn : Fading out. Rich : Compared to ARV lottery, the odds are incalculable. Correct? Provi : Col... what WILL happen? Col : Just making an example.... Provi : oh.. Provi : so it is something that will happen - not might happen. Provi : okay. Col : ARV is when you do a session on a target that WILL happen in the future. Like doing a session to describe the jerseys of the winning team of the SuperBowl. Dan : I think my subconscious is telling me something...it oicked the detroit lions for the superbowl Provi : okay. Col : When will Courtney see the sessions? Before the end of March or before? Provi : smile.. thanx, Courtney.. that works. Col : gotcha. that's what I wanted to know... Lyn : Get a perception - write it down - get a perception - write it down - get a ....... OtherT : Enjoy the day, Silver Col : Silver - g'nite! Col : Thanks Courtney!! Dan : thank you OtherT : thank you, Courtney. It's brilliant OtherT : gn all Dan : goodnite everyone